Yifeng Zhang Miami Eviction / Writ of Possession | Public Court Record

Tells the defendant what is required to challenge the residential eviction.

Requires written defenses and payment of rent into the court registry, or a motion to determine disputed rent, within five days excluding weekends and legal holidays. Warns that non-compliance may result in eviction without a hearing or further notice. The last two pages contain Spanish and Haitian Creole forms.

A summons is notice of a claim; it is not a determination of the alleged debt or proof of physical eviction.

Records mailing of the summons and complaint to the defendant.

The clerk certifies that a true and correct copy of the complaint and summons was sent by first-class mail to the residential address. The certificate and filed-for-record stamp show 7 May 2025.

The certificate records mailing; it does not establish that the defendant personally read the documents.

Explains how process was served and supplies the rent allegations missing from the earlier case summary.

Page 1 records posting at 9:40 a.m. on 8 May after unsuccessful attempts on 7 and 8 May. Pages 2-5 reproduce the summons. Page 6 reproduces Count I of the complaint: the landlord alleges a written lease with $9,200 monthly rent due on the first, $9,551 owed through April, and a pay-or-vacate notice served on 9 April 2025.

Service was by posting, not documented personal hand-delivery. The $9,551 and $9,200 are the landlord's allegations. The referenced lease and notice exhibits are not reproduced in the ten supplied PDFs.

Asks the court to enter default for failure to respond and failure to deposit rent.

Plaintiff's counsel states that no answer or other pleading was served before the motion and no money was deposited into the court registry. The motion also states that a Department of Defense military-status report could not be obtained without a valid social security number or date of birth.

This is the plaintiff's request and certification; the court's subsequent order supplies the actual default decision.

Asks for possession of the premises and immediate issuance of a writ.

The landlord requests a default possession judgment, alleging no response and no court-registry deposit. Paragraph 3 states that its claim for rent, court costs, attorney's fees and other remedies remains pending at that stage.

A request for money or a statement that a claim remains pending is not a money judgment. The later supplied final judgment awards possession only.

Supplies sworn statements supporting the application for default.

The attorney states that the defendant was not in U.S. military service. Page 2 states that no money had been accepted from or on behalf of the defendant since delivery, mailing or posting of the three-day notice. The affidavit is sworn and notarized on 28 May.

The non-payment statement is the attorney's affidavit, not an independently audited rent ledger. The separate motion states that a Department of Defense report could not be obtained.

Records the court's decision to enter default against Yifeng Zhang.

Judge Michael Barket enters default for failure to file or serve written defenses and failure to deposit any money into the court registry. The order addresses the motion identified as Docket Index 11. E-filing number 224289418.

The second supplied Order of Default has the same operative text, judge and date but a different e-filing stamp. These are not two separate default stages.

Preserves the additional court-file copy omitted from the earlier download collection.

Same judge, signature date, Docket Index 11 and operative default text as the first copy. This PDF instead carries e-filing number 224290343 at 08:53:01 on 2 June 2025. Its file bytes differ from the first copy.

This is a separately filed copy with the same operative text. It does not establish a second default ruling or a second eviction proceeding.

Awards possession to the landlord and directs issuance of a writ of possession.

Judge Michael Barket enters final judgment in favor of TWJ 1101, LLC d/b/a Panorama Tower and against Yifeng Zhang and all others in possession. The judgment directs that a writ of possession issue forthwith. Page 2 marks the case closed as to all parties. The May 28 date identifies the underlying motion; the judgment was entered on June 2.

This judgment awards possession. It does not award a stated rent amount or prove a sheriff physically executed the writ.

Commands the sheriff to remove occupants and put the landlord in possession.

The clerk-issued writ, stamped 12 June 2025, commands removal of persons from the premises and restoration of possession to the plaintiff after 24 hours' notice conspicuously posted on the premises.

The supplied collection contains the issued writ but no sheriff's return establishing when or whether physical removal occurred.