China court text · Full English translation
All 17 translations · Original document index
Civil Ruling — Likameisen Health Industry Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. v. Hangzhou Hanyi E-Commerce Co., Ltd.; withdrawal permitted
（2020）粤0106民初880号之一 · Tianhe District People’s Court, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province
Decision: 2020-03-23 · collected 1 October 2026 · translated 2 October 2026
Editorial English translation of the complete substantive body available in the collected Chinese court-text copy. This is not an official or certified translation, and the collected text is not a court-issued original PDF. Source masking, differing figures and apparent transcription errors are preserved and explained.
Document heading
Civil Ruling
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
民事裁定书
Parties
Plaintiff: Likameisen Health Industry Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., domiciled at Rooms 1516–1520, No. 140 Zhongshan Avenue West, Tianhe District, Guangzhou.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
原告：丽卡美森健康产业科技（广州）有限公司，住所地广州市天河区中山大道西路140号1516-1520房。
Legal representative: Wang**.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
法定代表人:王**。
Authorized litigation representatives: Zhang Chuangang and Xu Ruoyu, respectively a lawyer and a trainee lawyer at Guangdong Zhengnuo Law Firm.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
委托诉讼代理人：张传刚、许若宇，分别系广东正诺律师事务所律师、实习律师。
Defendant: Hangzhou Hanyi E-Commerce Co., Ltd., domiciled at Room 1104, Building 2, Chuangzhi Lügu Development Center, Jianggan District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
被告：杭州涵意电子商务有限公司，住所地浙江省杭州市江干区创智绿谷发展中心2幢1104室。
Legal representative: Sun*.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
法定代表人：孙*。
Third party: He*, male, born on ****-**-**, Han ethnicity, residing at **.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
第三人：何*，男，****年**月**日出生，汉族，住**。
Procedural history
In the service-contract dispute between the plaintiff, Likameisen Health Industry Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., the defendant, Hangzhou Hanyi E-Commerce Co., Ltd., and the third party, He*, this Court registered the case on 9 January 2020. On 20 March 2020, the plaintiff, Likameisen Health Industry Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., applied to this Court to withdraw the action.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
原告丽卡美森健康产业科技（广州）有限公司与被告杭州涵意电子商务有限公司、第三人何*服务合同纠纷一案中，本院于2020年1月9日立案。原告丽卡美森健康产业科技（广州）有限公司于2020年3月20日向本院提出撤诉申请。
Court’s reasoning
This Court considers that the application by the plaintiff, Likameisen Health Industry Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., complies with the relevant legal provisions and should be allowed. Pursuant to Article 145, paragraph 1, and Article 154, paragraph 1, item (5), of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, this Court rules as follows:
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
本院认为，原告丽卡美森健康产业科技（广州）有限公司的申请符合有关法律规定，应予准许。依照《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第一百四十五条第一款,第一百五十四条第一款第（五）项的规定，裁定如下：
Disposition
The plaintiff, Likameisen Health Industry Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., is permitted to withdraw the action.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
准许原告丽卡美森健康产业科技（广州）有限公司撤诉。
The case acceptance fee of RMB 41,687 is reduced by half to RMB 20,844 and shall be borne by the plaintiff, Likameisen Health Industry Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
案件受理费41687元，减半收取20844元，由原告丽卡美森健康产业科技（广州）有限公司负担。
Decision date
23 March 2020
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
二零二零年三月二十三日
Translation and source notes
- This is an editorial English translation of the complete collected Chinese court-text copy, not an official or certified translation and not a court-issued original PDF.
- Personal-name masks, birth-date masks and anonymized addresses appearing in the collected text are retained. Unmasked names are transliterated; no masked identity is reconstructed.
- The collected text does not include judge or clerk signature lines. No missing signatures, images or original-document metadata have been reconstructed.
- The ruling permits withdrawal and does not determine the merits of the service-contract dispute.
- The original fee is RMB 41,687; the source expressly states the reduced fee as RMB 20,844. The stated figure is retained rather than recalculated.
- Corporate English names are transliterations or descriptive translations of the Chinese names; the collected text does not establish registered English names.
Documents are dated records of the named parties and proceedings. Allegations, defenses, court reasoning and operative orders remain separate. Company obligations are not automatically personal obligations. Naming a person does not allege responsibility for a different party’s conduct.