China court text · Full English translation
All 17 translations · Original document index
Enforcement Ruling — Zhou** v. UDZ Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.; this round of enforcement concluded
（2019）京0102执6734号 · Xicheng District People’s Court, Beijing
Decision: 2019-06-03 · collected 1 October 2026 · translated 2 October 2026
Editorial English translation of the complete substantive body available in the collected Chinese court-text copy. This is not an official or certified translation, and the collected text is not a court-issued original PDF. Source masking, differing figures and apparent transcription errors are preserved and explained.
Document heading
Enforcement Ruling
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
执行裁定书
Parties
Applicant for enforcement: Zhou**, female, born on ****-**-**, Manchu ethnicity, registered domicile at **.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
申请执行人：周**，女，****年**月**日出生，满族，户籍地**。
Judgment debtor: UDZ Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., domiciled at Room 2953, 29th Floor, Block C, No. Jia 6 Jianguomenwai Avenue, Chaoyang District, Beijing.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
被执行人：优定制科技（北京）有限公司，住所地北京市朝阳区建国门外大街甲6号C座29层2953室。
Legal representative: Zhang**.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
法定代表人:张**。
Procedural history
In the service-contract dispute between the applicant, Zhou**, and the judgment debtor, UDZ Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., the legal document of the Xicheng District People’s Court, Beijing, in case (2018) Jing 0102 Min Chu No. 20832 has become legally effective. The judgment debtor, UDZ Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., is to pay Zhou** a service fee of RMB 25,000, a case acceptance fee of RMB 213, a public-notice fee of RMB 560, interest on the debt for the period of delayed performance, and other expenses.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
申请人周**与被执行人优定制科技（北京）有限公司劳务合同纠纷一案，北京市西城区人民法院（2018）京0102民初20832号法律文书已经发生法律效力。被执行人优定制科技（北京）有限公司支付周**劳务费人民币25000元,案件受理费213元、公告费560元及迟延履行期间的债务利息等其他费用。
During enforcement: 1. This Court served the judgment debtor by special judicial mail with an enforcement notice and an order to report property. The judgment debtor did not actually perform its obligations.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
在执行过程中，1、本院通过司法专邮形式向被执行人邮寄送达执行通知、报告财产令，被执行人未实际履行。
2. This Court served the judgment debtor with a consumption-restriction order and applied measures restricting high consumption to it.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
2、本院向被执行人送达限制消费令，对其适用限制高消费措施。
3. This Court placed the judgment debtor on the national court China Dishonest Debtor Record list and published that entry on the China Enforcement Information Disclosure website.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
3、本院将被执行人纳入全国法院失信被执行人名单，并在中国执行信息公开网上公布。
4. This Court searched for information concerning property belonging to the judgment debtor through the nationwide online asset inquiry and control system and the Beijing courts’ enforcement case-handling system. It found only a small amount of bank deposits in the judgment debtor’s name.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
4、本院通过全国网络查控系统及北京法院执行办案系统查询了被执行人名下相关财产信息，发现被执行人名下仅有少量银行存款。
5. During enforcement, no vehicles or real estate were found in the judgment debtor’s name.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
5、在执行过程中，没有发现被执行人名下有车辆和房产。
6. No other property of the judgment debtor available for enforcement was found. Accordingly, the amount sought for enforcement in this case and the corresponding interest could not be recovered through enforcement.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
6、未发现被执行人有其他可供执行的财产。故本案的申请标的金额及相应利息未能执行。
7. This Court informed the applicant for enforcement of the foregoing enforcement circumstances and information, including the investigation’s finding that the judgment debtor currently had no property available for enforcement, and requested property leads. The applicant for enforcement accepted the Court’s investigation findings, was unable to provide property leads, and agreed to conclusion of this round of enforcement.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
7、上述执行情况及信息，本院将被执行人名下暂无财产可供执行的调查结果告知申请执行人，并要求其提供财产线索，申请执行人认可法院的调查结果，不能提供财产线索，并同意终结本次执行程序。
In conclusion, the property investigation in this case identified no property available for enforcement. Following examination and verification by the collegiate panel and approval by the president of the Court, pursuant to Article 519 of the Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation on the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, this Court rules as follows:
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
综上所述，本案经过财产调查未发现可供执行的财产，在合议庭审查核实并经院长批准后，依照《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国民事诉讼法>的解释》第五百一十九条的规定，裁定如下：
Disposition
This round of enforcement is concluded.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
终结本次执行程序。
After this round of enforcement is concluded, the judgment debtor remains obligated to continue performing its debt obligations. If the applicant for enforcement discovers property belonging to the judgment debtor available for enforcement, or leads concerning such property, the applicant is entitled to apply to this Court for enforcement to resume.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
本次执行程序终结后，被执行人仍有继续履行债务的义务，申请执行人如发现被执行人有可供执行的财产或财产线索，有权向本院申请恢复执行。
This ruling takes legal effect upon service.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
本裁定书送达后即发生法律效力。
Decision date
3 June 2019
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
二零一九年六月三日
Translation and source notes
- This is an editorial English translation of the complete collected Chinese court-text copy, not an official or certified translation and not a court-issued original PDF.
- Personal-name masks, birth-date masks and anonymized addresses appearing in the collected text are retained. Unmasked names are transliterated; no masked identity is reconstructed.
- The collected text does not include judge or clerk signature lines. No missing signatures, images or original-document metadata have been reconstructed.
- The company is the judgment debtor in this ruling. Its recorded corporate designation is not automatically attributed to its masked legal representative as a personal listing.
- The consumption restriction, list entry, asset findings and nonperformance are statements in the 2019 ruling. They do not independently establish the company’s present registry status, present balance or current court-list status.
- The judgment underlying this ruling states a case acceptance fee of RMB 425; this enforcement text states RMB 213. The difference is preserved without inferring its cause.
- Concluding this round of enforcement is not a discharge of the debt; the source expressly retains the continuing obligation and the right to request resumed enforcement.
Documents are dated records of the named parties and proceedings. Allegations, defenses, court reasoning and operative orders remain separate. Company obligations are not automatically personal obligations. Naming a person does not allege responsibility for a different party’s conduct.