China court text · Full English translation
All 17 translations · Original document index
Enforcement Ruling — China Mobile Group Beijing Co., Ltd. v. Panke (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.; this round of enforcement concluded
（2016）京0101执4926号 · Dongcheng District People’s Court, Beijing
Decision: 2016-10-24 · collected 1 October 2026 · translated 2 October 2026
Editorial English translation of the complete substantive body available in the collected Chinese court-text copy. This is not an official or certified translation, and the collected text is not a court-issued original PDF. Source masking, differing figures and apparent transcription errors are preserved and explained.
Document heading
Enforcement Ruling — China Mobile Group Beijing Co., Ltd. and Panke (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. Publication date: 27 October 2016.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
中国移动通信集团北京有限公司与磐科（北京）科技有限公司执行裁定书发布日期：2016-10-27
Parties
Applicant for enforcement: China Mobile Group Beijing Co., Ltd.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
申请执行人中国移动通信集团北京有限公司。
Legal representative: Zhou*, chairman and general manager.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
法定代表人周*，董事长、总经理。
Authorized representative: Li Zhiguang, lawyer at Beijing Zhongyin Law Firm.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
委托代理人李智光，北京中银律师事务所律师。
Judgment debtor: Panke (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
被执行人磐科（北京）科技有限公司。
Legal representative: Zhang**.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
法定代表人张**。
Procedural history
In the telecommunications-service-contract dispute between the applicant for enforcement, China Mobile Group Beijing Co., Ltd., and the judgment debtor, Panke (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., Civil Judgment (2015) Dong Min Chu Zi No. 07114, issued by the Dongcheng District People’s Court, Beijing, has become legally effective. On 18 August 2016, the applicant for enforcement, China Mobile Group Beijing Co., Ltd., applied to this Court for enforcement, seeking payment by the judgment debtor, Panke (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., of RMB 4,327.33 awarded in the case, together with the corresponding interest.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
申请执行人中国移动通信集团北京有限公司与被执行人磐科（北京）科技有限公司电信服务合同纠纷一案，北京市东城区人民法院作出的（2015）东民初字第07114号民事判决书已经发生法律效力。申请执行人中国移动通信集团北京有限公司于2016年8月18日向本院申请执行，要求被执行人磐科（北京）科技有限公司给付案款人民币4327.33元及相应利息。
During enforcement, this Court issued an enforcement notice to the judgment debtor, directing it to perform the obligations established by the effective legal document, but the judgment debtor has not performed them to date. Investigation found no bank deposits belonging to the judgment debtor available for enforcement, no registered real estate, and no registered vehicles. This Court has placed the judgment debtor on the China Dishonest Debtor Record list. The applicant for enforcement has not been able to provide this Court with the judgment debtor’s whereabouts or leads concerning its property available for enforcement. This Court has also been unable, through the prescribed legal procedures, to locate property belonging to the judgment debtor available for enforcement. Accordingly, pursuant to Article 154, paragraph 1, item (11), of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China and Article 519 of the Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation on the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, this Court rules as follows:
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
本院在执行过程中，向被执行人发出执行通知书责令其履行生效法律文书确定的义务，但被执行人至今未履行。经查，被执行人名下无可供执行的银行存款，无房产登记信息，无车辆登记信息，本院已将被执行人纳入失信被执行人名单。现申请执行人未能向本院提供被执行人下落及其可供执行的财产线索。本院依法定程序亦未能查找到被执行人可供执行的财产。据此，依据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第一百五十四条第一款第（十一）项、《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国民事诉讼法>的解释》第五百一十九条之规定，裁定如下：
Disposition
This round of enforcement of Civil Judgment (2015) Dong Min Chu Zi No. 07114, issued by this Court, is concluded.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
终结本院作出的（2015）东民初字第07114号民事判决书的本次执行程序。
After this round of enforcement is concluded, if the applicant for enforcement discovers that the judgment debtor has the ability to perform its obligations, it may apply for enforcement to resume, without being subject to the limitation period for applying for enforcement. The judgment debtor remains obligated to continue performing its debt obligations.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
本次执行程序终结后，申请执行人发现被执行人具备履行能力时，可以申请恢复执行，不受申请执行时效期间的限制，被执行人仍有继续履行债务的义务。
This ruling takes legal effect upon service.
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
本裁定送达后即发生法律效力。
Decision date
24 October 2016
Chinese source passage / 中文原文
二零一六年十月二十四日
Translation and source notes
- This is an editorial English translation of the complete collected Chinese court-text copy, not an official or certified translation and not a court-issued original PDF.
- Personal-name masks, birth-date masks and anonymized addresses appearing in the collected text are retained. Unmasked names are transliterated; no masked identity is reconstructed.
- The collected text does not include judge or clerk signature lines. No missing signatures, images or original-document metadata have been reconstructed.
- “To date” reports the court’s position at the time of the ruling, not an independently verified present balance or present court-list status.
- Concluding this round of enforcement is not a discharge of the debt: the source expressly preserves the continuing obligation and the ability to seek resumed enforcement.
- Corporate English names are transliterations or descriptive translations; registered English names are not established by this collected text.
Documents are dated records of the named parties and proceedings. Allegations, defenses, court reasoning and operative orders remain separate. Company obligations are not automatically personal obligations. Naming a person does not allege responsibility for a different party’s conduct.